Why are All Eyes on the David Patraeus Infidelity Saga, But Complete Silence on Military Rapes?

David Patraeus

The recent shake up in amongst military leaders has evolved into the ultimate soap opera. First we have General David Patraeus being forced to retire from the CIA last week for cheating on his wife and now we have General John R Allen under investigation who took Patraeus’ place in Afghanistan.

The person who blew the whistle on Patraeus was a family friend named Jill Kelley. She was being harassed by Patraeus’ lover and biographer Paula Broadwell who thought that Kelley was somehow romantically linked to the general. The truth of the matter is that Kelley and her husband have been longtime friends with the Patraeus’. This was not known to Broadwell who resented the close relationship she perceived Kelley had with the general. She responded by stepping to Kelley and sent off a bunch of threatening emails warning Kelly to stay away.

Late yesterday,  the story took a new twist when it was announced  that General Allen who was recently nominated to head the U.S. European Command and NATO forces in Europe may have some involvement. His nomination has been put on hold while he’s being investigated for sending 20-30 thousand pages of emails to Jill Kelley over the past two years. Everyone wants to know whats going on with those two. They have not said if there was some sort of romantic hook up or if he had been revealing government secrets. Right now the word from Leon Panetta is Allen had ‘inappropriate communications‘ with Kelley..

General John R. Allen

Thus far damn near every news agency is on top of this story as folks are seemingly eager to see heads roll. It’s the big talk all on Capitol Hill with lawmakers like Senator Diane Feinstein and Congressman Peter King demanding further investigation. They are furious that they were ‘left in the dark’. Today there will be hearings.

It’s good to see that the military brass and people sitting in the halls of power have stepped up to hold folks accountable. If having an affair is a big ‘no-no’ in military circles, then I say right on for being hard-nosed in enforcing the rules. We should expect more from our men and women in uniform.

With that being said, what’s confusing, ironic and quite sad is the lack of media fan fare and the lack zeal to see heads roll around the fact that the military is the scene to tens of thousands of rapes every year. Very few are demanding to know why in 2010 we had close to 20 thousand rapes on military bases? Yes, you read that right,. America’s dirty little secret is that we have horrifically high number of female soldiers being raped by their male counterparts.. Some of you reading this may think I’m trying to be sensational with my numbers, but rest assured I’m not. I’m quoting stats from Department of Defence. There’s an Academy nominated heart wrenching documentary called The Invisible War that unearth’s this under reported story.

Jill Kelley

One would think more of us would be outraged especially after we had several months of discussion about ‘legitimate rape’ during the Presidential campaign. One would’ve thought that we as a society would be moving quickly to purge not only those responsible for these sexual assaults but also the military leaders whose watch in which these rapes occurred. Why aren’t we having news conferences about someone like Patraeus,  Allen or some other high-ranking general being kicked out and investigated because thousands of rapes have occurred under their leadership?

Sadly most of us have remained oblivious to the rapes on military bases or have simply turned a blind eye. Others have the nerve to rationalize an explain how the military has strict rules around officers having affairs while remaining dead silent on the rapes epidemic…Explain that one..

More importantly explain what steps we intend to take to eradicate rapes in the military. Why is our mainstream media focusing on the Generals but silent as a church mouse on a horrific act that’ll leave many severely scared for a lifetime? I guess we as a society are comfortable with the War on Women continuing.

Something to think about..

written by Davey D

PS.. Wanna give some additional food for thought about this case..We have a couple of things going on here.. First is the cover ups and silence of the high number of rapes in the military. Second we have the fallout around Patraeus.. Here’s an article that breaks down who Paula Broadwell is..she was more than just a biographer..

A Covert Affair: Petraeus Caught in the Honeypot?

By Justin Raimondo

 November 12, 2012 “
Information Clearing House” - The outing of Gen. David Petraeus as an adulterer, and his subsequent resignation as CIA Director, was carried out by an unknown FBI “whistleblower” who leaked the facts of the FBI investigation into the General’s private life to Rep. Eric Cantor. The New York Times reports:

Eric Cantor, the House majority leader, said Saturday an F.B.I. employee whom his staff described as a whistle-blower told him about Mr. Petraeus’s affair and a possible security breach in late October, which was after the investigation had begun.

“’I was contacted by an F.B.I. employee concerned that sensitive, classified information may have been compromised and made certain Director Mueller was aware of these serious allegations and the potential risk to our national security,’ Mr. Cantor said in a statement.

Mr. Cantor talked to the person after being told by Representative Dave Reichert, Republican of Washington, that a whistle-blower wanted to speak to someone in the Congressional leadership about a national security concern. On Oct. 31, his chief of staff, Steve Stombres, called the F.B.I. to tell them about the call.”

The FBI probe apparently started in late spring, when several people associated with Petraeus — not just the one woman, as has been reported elsewhere — received harassing emails. The emails were traced to 40-year-old Paula Broadwell, national security analyst, military intelligence veteran, and author of a biography of Petraeus. Authorities believed his email account may have been hacked, and this led to a remarkable irony: the CIA chief’s emails were monitored, without his knowledge, whereupon it was discovered Broadwell may have either had access to his account or tried to obtain access. In any case, in the course of their spying, FBI monitors discovered a large volume of emails to and from Broadwell. Looking for evidence of a security breach, all they found was evidence of a “human drama,” as one anonymous FBI official put it: an illicit affair between Petraeus and Broadwell.

Petraeus was only informed of the investigation on October 25 or 26. So here we have the astonishing fact of the CIA’s head honcho being spied on for a period of months by our own law enforcement officials.

Or maybe it wasn’t a simple case of complaints about “harassing” or threatening emails. Fox News avers:

The FBI had been investigating an unrelated and much broader case before stumbling on the affair. Fox News has learned that during the course of this investigation, the name of biographer Paula Broadwell came up. The FBI followed that lead and in doing so, uncovered his affair with her.”

What was this “much broader case”? Almost certainly it was a counterintelligence investigation, i.e. a pushback against efforts by some foreign entity to penetrate or otherwise compromise US secrets. We can only guess at the specifics, however we do know that in the course of that investigation Broadwell’s name “came up.”

On the surface, at least, Broadwell is not the sort of person whose name would come up in a counterintelligence investigation: a West Point graduate, where she earned degrees in political geography and systems engineering, she seems like the veritable embodiment of All-American
red-white-and-blue super-patriotism. This biographical account on her high school website says

Paula pursued a military intelligence career abroad, serving in Asia, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. During her service, especially after 9-11, Paula’s intensity was directed toward the war against terror; her contributions and efforts to thwart terrorism have been commended by the U.S. Army and by Europe’s Special Operations Forces Commanding General. In this arena, she has planned counter-terrorism initiatives presented to NATO and worked on transnational counter-terrorism issues with foreign and domestic agencies, U.S. Special Forces, and the FBI.”

Graduate studies at the University of Denver in Middle East studies enabled her to travel to “Jordan and Israel,” and make a swing through the Persian Gulf and Europe where she spoke at various conferences. This triumphal tour was capped by a Harvard fellowship “for study in Syria and Iran.”

While Broadwell’s current academic affiliation is with Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government, her previous post was deputy director of the Jebsen Center for Counter-Terrorism Studies at Tufts University’s Fletcher School. The Center, according to its self-description, “distinguishes itself by a philosophy that maintains counter-terrorism should be predictive, preventive and preemptive, with the latter being a last resort.” Founded in 2005, the Jebsen Center was made possible by the generous donation of one Jan Henrik Jebsen, heir to the Norwegian shipping fortune, who gave $1.3 million to set it up. Jebsen, a former investment banker with Lazard Freres, is the principal of Gamma Applied Visions Group, an international octopus with tentacles all over the place: part arms dealer and weapons developer, part “green” energy company. As one might expect from someone who has so much of his multi-billion dollar fortune invested in making and selling armaments, Jebsen is on the board of directors of the distinctly warlike Hudson Institute, where Scooter LibbyDouglas FeithMichael Ledeen, and practically every neocon you’ve ever heard of have found refuge.

While, in true neocon fashion, Hudson scholars conjure a wide diversity of imminent “threats” to the US, includingChina and Russia, their main focus is the threat of Islamist radicalism, especially as it impacts Israel. Indeed, Hudson operates inside Israel, where it pushes the far-rightist views of the most extreme elements in Israeli society: the settler movement, and the faction of Likud angling for war with Iran. It has also focused its attention onpurging universities of academics who don’t toe the right-wing ultra-nationalist Likudnik line.

More recently, former Hudson president and “trustee emeritus” Max Singer — who has since moved to Israel, where, as a “public policy consultant” at Bar Ilan University, he spends his time inciting violence against Palestinians — is on a mission to protect Israel from the alleged threat posed by the President of the United States.

The Jebsen Center has been equally useful to the neocons. Richard H. Schultz, head of Tufts’ International Studies program (of which the Center is a part) was a signatory to the Project for a New American Century’s “open letter” to President Bush urging war with Iraq and a number of other Middle Eastern actors in the wake of 9/11. Here he is recommending the importation of Israeli “anti-terrorist” techniques to pacify the restless natives of Iraq. Here is another Jebsen Center scholar describing alleged terrorist actions engaged in by Iran worldwide. And then there’s the testimony of this guy:

The idea of overthrowing the Iranian government through covert but peaceful means is not original. The project was first brought to my attention in August 2006 when I worked as an intern research assistant at Tufts University’s Fletcher School of Diplomacy’s Jebsen Center for Counter-terrorism. I worked for the then director of the center Brigadier General Russell Howard (Ret.) on a project titled Bringing Down Iran Without Firing A Shot. I wasn’t very experienced in the world of covert operations in the field or in the academic realm but I was very interested in becoming involved in it. General Howard, on the other hand, was not only a counter-terrorism strategist but a veteran Special Forces officer, an academic, and a tutor. It was General Howard who introduced me to the idea of targeting factors specific to Iran in order to adapt to the country’s specific needs. He had six factors which he believed were important: The military use of ongoing insurgencies within Iran, political strife, economic strife, declining oil revenues, demographics, and deteriorating infrastructure.”

Interestingly, in November of 2006, during her tenure at the Jebsen Center, Broadwell led a group of Fletcher School students on a trip to New York City to meet with then Iranian UN representative Javad Zarif. Both arealumni of the Josef Korbel School of International Studies at the University of Denver.

All this establishes a context that goes far beyond the titillating details of the alleged affair between Petraeus and Broadwell — and this is no doubt what set alarm bells ringing in the intelligence community when it was revealed. Is there really any need to point out the uses of the “honeypot” in intelligence-gathering and other covert activities regularly engaged in by spooks of all nations? From Mata Hari to the Mossad agent who lured Israeli nuclear scientist Mordecahi Vanunu, sex is a time-honored weapon in the war of spy-vs-spy. A secret affair with the CIA Director is the equivalent of the Honeypot Olympics, and we have to ask: was the remarkably fit Ms. Broadwell a lure? If so, she’s won a Gold Medal.

Broadwell’s actions — sending emails that were bound to be traced back to her — appear to make little sense on the surface. But if the goal of luring a 60-year-old geezer into an affair with a much younger woman was to expose him, and get him fired, then surely her antics succeeded in accomplishing that goal.

So who would have an interest in getting rid of Petraeus? Here’s where the Cantor connection comes in. The tip by an anonymous “FBI employee” that wound up in Cantor’s office two weeks ago came through Rep. David Reichert, Republican of Washington state, who has a friend who knows the whistleblower. Cantor then spoke to the whistleblower directly, who put him in touch with FBI Director Mueller.

Cantor is a great friend of Israel, and Petraeus — not so much. The General was attacked, as you’ll recall, by partisans of the Lobby, including Abe Foxman, when he delivered testimony before Congress citing Israel as a strategic liability in the Middle East. As the executor of the new Obamaite policy of sidling up to Islamists, not only in Libya but also in Syria and Egypt, Petraeus was no doubt seen by the Israelis as an enemy to be neutralized.

Broadwell’s affiliation with the Jebsen Center, and the Center’s connection to the neoconservative network, sets the scene: a young, attractive woman with impeccable national security credentials throws herself at Petraeus, and he takes the bait. Whether she’s been recruited by a foreign intelligence agency at this point or not is irrelevant: he’s already put himself in a vulnerable position, and there are any number of actors on the international stage more than willing to press their advantage.

Will we ever know the full story? At this point, the story is so hot that it may burn the cover story — “it’s all about sex” — right off the wrapper. Because there’s more — a lot more — here than meets the eye. When Cantorpledged to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that he and his fellow Republicans “will serve as a check on the administration” in regard to the President’s policy toward Israel, he was clearly aligning himself with a foreign leader against American interests as perceived by the White House. But would he really go this far — deliberately taking down a key figure, one beloved by Republicans, in order to keep his promise to Netanyahu?

Stay tuned to this space, because this story is moving fast….

Update: This morning [11/12/12] the New York Times reports:

F.B.I. agents interviewed Ms. Broadwell for the first time the week of Oct. 21, and she acknowledged the affair, a government official briefed on the matter said. She also voluntarily gave the agency her computer. In a search, the agents discovered several classified documents, which raised the additional question of whether Mr. Petraeus had given them to her. She said that he had not. Agents interviewed Mr. Petraeus the following week. He also admitted to the affair but said he had not given any classified documents to her. The agents then interviewed Ms. Broadwell again on Friday, Nov. 2, the official said.”

Bingo!

Comments

  1. Thanks for this, Davey D.

    As an African Woman survivor of a gang rape at knife point by a group of negro cullard male soldiers (I refuse to call them African, Black or Men – and there is a difference between males and Men) in Oakland (years ago) who were stoned on cocaine and on their way to acquire more, I appreciate the article.

    I knew at least two of them were soldiers because they openly wore their ‘dog tags.’ I suspected some of the others – or all of them – to be soldiers as well, but they were not wearing visible proof. There were 8 of them. I fought them physically, to no avail. (I mean roughly 14-1500 lbs of them and about 100 lbs of me, a very vicious, military looking knife at my throat (2 sharpened sides, serrated edge on one side,) was somewhat superfluous, one would think.) I am not military.

    However I was almost a casualty of war, none the less.

    But I fought them mentally as well – and won because I fought and won the battle to not hate African MEN. I refused to be a victim and realized that to hate Black MEN would be to hate a piece of myself as well, and this I would not/will not do.

    However for rapists, (of any nationality, or gender) I have no mercy. And should I ever find those 8 males they will not breathe another breath. (even though they took great pains to protect their identities by wrapping my jeans around my head)

    F*ck the law. It does not protect African people in particular.

    It does, however, as your article so poignantly describes, protect rapists everywhere, military or not.

    And there were no ‘support organizations’ who cared, either. None of them would bestir their lilly white asses to assist an African Woman in deep east O. So f*ck them too.

    I won the war, alone, by myself.

    And I very seriously wonder how many of the women raped in the military are African? Do you have stats on that?

    ALL POWER TO THE PEOPLE.

  2. wow this is deep and extremely true-10

  3. Thats laugh_able in postfascist Europe, where sexual domestication and violence has an impact of ideology manners. Yes,..when conservative Amerikkka has its problems with pro_porn//sex positive activist – here we came on the spot of secret agencies,…when they act on that field, all the binaries of lawsuit will be suggested as social distortion, but when high Army profiles get des_illusioned by such inter_twined courses,…Aarrgghh,…for all revolutionary a win to take part in such critical men activities on scaling the patriarchy like it is,…partially an apes tribe.

    And yes,..I was sexually abused as a tabooed boy too.

  4. wow. definitely an eye opener. this should be on huff post! 6

  5. We are all misguided. You can’t have teh military as a whoe unit be bad. Then people won;t enlist and we cant have soldiers protecting oru shore and bombing other countries with vode game controller drones aircraft. We have to keep up the images that UNCLE SAM WANTS YOU.. So we keep that under wraps, keep God under wraps, and says homsexuality is okay and force us to accept it. (4)

  6. good post! – 8

  7. This was well written and an eye opener. damn smh -3

  8. leave this guy alone 1

  9. Somebody gotta go down I guess, next they will try and link it to the election watch (8)

  10. Cheating is so common. Does it really affect his job performance?

  11. rape ??????? 11

  12. As to mention how to narrate the Rap[e] term of use, I must appreciate the skill of postfascist European constituencies by left radical and Arabic spreadings, that here by a killing series of Nazi Underground, five chiefs of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Office_for_the_Protection_of_the_Constitution ,…has been fired by shredding all relevant papers for lawsuits and protecting these Nazi Killahs. They could only punish leftist and Islamist by – but the sexual abusement of the abusment has its impact on rough necks, that all ped_o_philes has thier lawsuits by an ongoing ‘anti_’ sentiment of ‘other_Ing’ and giving hetero_patriarchal men the scapegoaths to do thier job and rap[e] the speech off criticism. So education and ongoing militancy will apprehend these failures of white idolatry,…and of course ‘bass_Ism against conspi_racism’ will march through the institutions of DIY antifascist action.

    Some generals in the USA was only the beginning of new radical, critical men.

  13. He can be extorted the easiest becuz he knows too much .. the boss so to speak.

  14. burn his butt but really mostly everybody cheated at something n doesnt change the fact he was a hero

  15. burn his butt but really mostly everybody cheated at something n doesnt change the fact he was a hero

    Let us know what u think..

    Recent Posts
    Why are All Eyes on the David Patraeus Infidelity Saga, But Complete Silence on Military Rapes?
    KRS-One and NYOil Drop 2 Seperate Videos Addressing Hurricane Sandy..Very Dope
    The Obama Conquest Newsweek Cover Stirs up an Array of Emotions.
    On Veterans Day Lets Do More than a Parade to Thank Our Troops
    Public Enemy Weighs in on Immigration Question w/ a New Song called ICE Breaker
    Obama’s Re-Elected What Next? Michael Skolnik of Global Grind & Hip Hop Activist Rosa Clemente Weigh In
    M1 of dead prez Teams up w/ Nas to Pay Tribute to Denmark Vessey
    A Year Ago Cal Students Were Beaten by Police Protesting Fee Hikes-They’re still Fighting Back
    19 Years Ago the World Was Introduced to Wu-Tang Clan..’The 36 Chambers’
    Was President Obama’s Re-Election About Our Hopes or Our Fears?
    Meta
    Register
    Log in
    Entries RSS
    Comments RSS
    WordPress.com

  16. great post – 8

Trackbacks

  1. […] Why are All Eyes on the David Patraeus Infidelity Saga, But Complete Silence on Military Rapes? « D…. […]

  2. […] Why are All Eyes on the David Patraeus Infidelity Saga, But Complete Silence on Military Rapes? (hiphopandpolitics.wordpress.com) […]

  3. […] Why are All Eyes on the David Patraeus Infidelity Saga, But Complete Silence on Military Rapes? (hiphopandpolitics.wordpress.com) […]

Leave a Reply