Clear Channel is Done In the next 6 Months-But Will Radio Survive

daveydbanner

Share/Save/Bookmark//

Radio After Clear Channel

Thursday, June 11, 2009

Clear Channel is done.

The next six to nine months will constitute what I believe will be their swan song as a consolidated radio company. None of us can take any joy in this.

The economy isn’t helping.

It’s killing over-leveraged radio owners on their debt repayment. Some stations are actually making money, but not enough to pay down huge corporate debt – the debt that was purchased when they put together their radio clusters.

This piece is about what radio will be like after Clear Channel is broken up.

But first, the reason why we’re having this discussion in the first place.

The investment companies of Lee Capital Partners and Bain Media made a mistake when they went through with the acquisition of Clear Channel (radio and outdoor) to the tune of about $20 billion. The banks gave them an out. Lee & Bain refused to take it.

They knowingly walked down a dangerous path acquiring a company in a declining industry with a recession bearing down.

I’ve asked financial analysts to try and explain to me how smart investors could do such a thing and the answer I received was – for the fees.

Lee & Bain profited by closing the deal. Perhaps they didn’t think things would get this bad, but they have.

Recent attempts to bully their lenders into a more favorable debt arrangement seems to be failing. Clear Channel could be in bankruptcy by the end of the year or the first quarter of 2010.

The company appears to be battening down the hatches for the inevitable.

Wall Street buyout companies are used to winning and losing. They have done plenty of both. It comes with the game. But the one constant – fees – is what drives the buyout market.

I believe that Lee & Bain will be uprooted from this situation if and when the company seeks bankruptcy protection.

Bankruptcy is a slippery slope to say the least.

The fate of the company is in the hands of a bankruptcy judge. Other interests, including those of the investors and creditors seeking to avoid a full haircut are also a factor, but…

It is more likely in my view that much or all of Clear Channel will eventually be broken up – sold off to raise as much revenue as possible.

The present management may also be kicked aside – again, a bankruptcy judge has a lot of influence here.

Clear Channel is already acting like there is no tomorrow.

What do you call gutting the stations, cutting every possible expense and using repeater radio content from national syndicators and their network to fill up the airwaves? Even Clear Channel Radio President John Slogan Hogan isn’t that dumb. He’s taking orders. I don’t believe he would do this without a gun to his head.

What employees are left when the end comes will not exactly be in a strong position. And former employees with severance agreements or retirees could have their futures jeopardized.

Again, the court makes the call.

It should also be noted that Clear Channel isn’t the only large radio group to face bankruptcy. I believe Cumulus and Citadel are goners as well. They may be lucky enough (or unlucky enough as the case may be) to turn more of their equity into debt repayment but eventually they will have to pay the piper.

And, there doesn’t seem to be a huge interest among debt holders to own more of these mismanaged, over-leveraged radio companies.

As an aside, I want to remind you that you and I didn’t cause this problem so when we discuss it — as depressing as it is — do not forget how radio got to this juncture. You could look the other way, believe the happy talk that radio associations and others try to peddle or you could deal with the inevitable.

Because ultimately, the decline of three of the biggest radio consolidators will affect many of you.

If Citadel goes down before Clear Channel, it would be less devastating than the number one consolidator going bankrupt. As we have learned from the past in strategic financial management, programming or sales, when Clear Channel gets a cold, the radio industry gets pneumonia.

Having said that, there is an interesting scenario I see ahead – not all bad or all good and certainly with many risks.

Let me take you through radio after Clear Channel, in my opinion, step by step:

1. There is unlikely to be a buyer for the entire Clear Channel radio chain.

2. There may be a buyer for the outdoor division – maybe.

3. Clear Channel’s radio stations will eventually be sold off to offset the massive losses incurred in advance of the bankruptcy filing.

4. Multiples for radio stations – please sit down here – will be for the best price offered in some markets and no higher than 4x cash flow on average in the largest markets. Radio is a damaged business thanks to consolidation and it will be reflected in the painful process of selling off stations that were once overpriced for a lot less.

5. Many stations will be returned to the marketplace where eager buyers – those who have radio in their blood – will be ready to put together a group to operate. This is a good thing for the audience and not necessarily a good thing for the buyers. Turning radio around will be tough.

6. As in the past, any new buyer who picks up stations in the Clear Channel bankruptcy will have a hard time making it work if they do not buy the station with debt they can handle in a recession and in a world where the next generation will not be their audience – ever.

7. Thus, good radio people who have been waiting for this moment may be the unwitting victims of consolidation one more time – the inability to build a growth franchise on only two generations – X and Baby Boomers, both aging.

8. There is an unintended consequence from Clear Channel’s eventual demise and that is the detonation of terrestrial radio in the eyes of advertisers and agencies. The way back is to build local stations with a local presence – and the next successful radio owners will probably know how to do this.

9. Then there is the legacy factor – Clear Channel will be leaving systems in place that new owners may end up embracing including voice tracking (hey, it’s okay on the all-night show and some weekend dayparts, right?) and no traffic directors. In other words, once an owner, some of these good-hearted radio operators may find it hard to undo less is more.

Radio after Clear Channel will not be radio as if Clear Channel never existed.

Reread that line because you can take it to the bank.

Our fantasy is that once rid of these evil consolidators, radio can return to its former position of prominence.

But it will be hard to simply go back 15 or 20 years before duopoly and consolidation.

It will take a Steve Jobs-type to say, “Mr. Hogan, tear down this wall”.

Some cost efficiencies will be retained in spite of the “unpeople-friendly” or anti-audience effects they may have.

And there is always the possibility that some “little” Clear Channel’s will emerge from the rubble and make you wish for the day the Mays boys were back in charge (let’s hope not, but it is possible).

So, the net effect is that many stations are about ready to come home to radio people in an industry drastically hurt by consolidators.

Some of them may buy the stations and over-leverage themselves and you know what will happen to them.

Others will find local niches and return to a model similar to but not exactly like local radio of the past and rebuild or grow good franchises in the short term.

Only owners who also know how to build new media businesses – podcasting franchises, new non-terrestrial radio streams, mobile content, capitalize on social networking and new media – will really be set for the future.

For the rest, the last insult may not be the demise of the Evil Empire but the lure of purchasing radio stations at long last for favorable prices at a time in history when an entire generation is not available to be a growth engine.

I would buy a radio station not because it makes money or could make money again, but because it has a brand — a real strong brand – that could lead into a digital media platform. A digital media platform is not defined as streaming the station on the web or having your morning personality do a podcast.

Without the strong brand, well meaning and good intentioned radio operators may wind up eventually being the victims of radio consolidators one more time – with the Clear Channel, Citadel and Cumulus groups out of harms way and new owners directly in it.

The best advice: buyer beware.

source:

http://insidemusicmedia.blogspot.com/2009/06/radio-after-clear-channel.html

Return to Davey D’s Hip Hop Corner

Davey D article

Comments

  1. WOW!!!!!

  2. Robert Jr. James McClendon says:

    One thing for certain, as long as they make records there’s going to be a radio station to play it regardless who owns it. “Our people can’t have nothing nice”. We sell-out every time. Go back to hiring local Black Dj’s and forget the Tom Joyner Syndication crap where they control the whole country. I don’t care if radio is black owned or white owned, as long as the Dj’s are black, personally.

  3. flavorblade says:

    This good be a good thing for ROIAK stock. They have the multi-media approach down. In addition to the terrestial stations they have a Siruis station, piece of cable TV (TV One), social networking Black Planet.com, and print Giant Magazine. They can sell some nice advertising packages. That’s a healthy buzz word – advertising packages. Their Gospel and Old Soul music stations are an attractive part of the package that audience is more affluent on average than the young R&B Hip-hop audience.

    Someone always benfits from death.

  4. Bob Steele says:

    radio one has no approach down, radio one is in the situation they are in, because when they brought stations they also brought “debt.” anytime you buy somthing you are also buying “debt.” plus they went on a spending spree, in a over valued market, radio one has been told for the last 5 years to sell and or scale back, but they continued to go into other ventures in a bad market envoirment. This happens when u bite off more than you can chew and digest. At best radio one won’t be benefitting from this, but they may return to thier core Bmore DC roots.

  5. I personally think that you are “misremembering” what radio was like before consolidation.

  6. monk one says:

    I for one care if radio is black owned but it’s who that’s black, owning it are they going to be innovative like black radio once was or be block busted like they were 30 years ago and out boogied to where they then played the consolidation game and still came out at the bottom once upon a time black radio was more innovative… before consolidation, today is a generation just willing to acquesse in the guise of progress.

  7. flavorblade says:

    That may be the other side of the coin “debt”. Still radio is free so it has an audience. Maybe one day radio will be all internet and satellite but until that is delivered free in a vehicle radio will have an audience. I agree radio has undergone a shift in userability. No-one listens to radio in the home anymore not even the backyard. It’s a while driving leisure activity.

    To me Radio One has to present advertisers with diverse marketing oppurtunites to survive. You need varied station demographics, internet-high volumne social networking sites, satellite, show promotions synergy (sub contracting space), and TV. I’m personally skeptical about print. I see the magazine declining, but for the short term it can be useful as part of an advertising package. Give the buyers the most exposure outlets for their money. That’s how you beat the next man for the ever diminshing advertising budgets dollars.

    Advertising revenue is the only way to make profits. Biting off more than they could chew? I see cooking a full course meal. The groceries cost and it takes time for everything to get ready. However, the guests should get their fill.

  8. bob steele says:

    there is no sell for advertising, check the shrinking ad dollars, radio one is trying like monk one stated acquessing to a business model that is broken people would have more respect for them if they had a an innovative business plan, innovation beats the next man for ad dollars, not following clear channel, and continuing to play in a system that fails your bottom line dollar. that’s were radio one failed, they are carrying more debt then they are profit bottom line.

  9. Ivory Tower Media Co. says:

    We all too often throw away the best of the best by embracing someone else’s alleged model of success, and in the end we lose on so many different levels. So often I look at the “trick bag” black broadcasters have allowed themselves to be lured into with tighter music formats and abandoning the on the hour black news networks that were the common chord running throughout the African-American communities, keeping us abreast of immediate and pertinent news. The inability to hear and respond immediately lends to the image of our being inconsequential. I truly miss the old black personality broadcasters that made black radio something special to tune into to every single day. Maybe the breakup of Clear Channel for that reason could be a good thing.

  10. Robert Jr. James McClendon says:

    And what’s with giving that ignorant lady Wendy Williams a talk show. It’s like they not going to give up on Hip-hop (Helpling Ignorant people -hurt our people) are they? Time to grow up, people. Time for a new generation of Black people to build something historical and new – the hip-hop virus has run its course for the past 24 years. Time to grow up, people.

  11. Davey, if you’re going to republish Jerry Del Colliano’s blog word for word, you should give him credit.

  12. There is no black radio stations point blank!! There are black personalities on coroporate owned radio stations and it’s always been like that for the most part, with a few exceptions. Also, all these so called stations are owned by one parent company Radio One.

    Each region has the exact same play list with a few exceptions of tunes sliding into the list. We are in 2009 and the internet has opened up a new lane where music outside the major label clutches is easily accesible. I could care less nowadays about main stream radio, it’s too controlled and not enough independent music is given air time because it lacks big corporate funding from major labels.

  13. evan harris says:

    flavorblade, you fall for the let’s play in the system mentality, the reason why hiphop and r&b are no longer sells is because there is no hiphop or r&b today to speak of in the first place, radio in the 90’s became fragmented, a station with hiphop and today’s r&b, a station with classic soul and today’s r&b the music people really will listen to now is classic soul, r&b like hiphop in the 90’s got the heart and soul sucked out of it, whatever you choose to call it wether it be the mask term “urban radio.” or “black radio.” todays radio programmed to black people is wack, and, to follow in a system that continues to make it wack is blind ambition to no where.

  14. Stay updated on the latest new music from Political soul and R&B singer Yajdi. Like the Yadji Official facebook page and follow Yadji on twitter.

  15. the new single from sound cloud for free today only!